Nation: The Most Meaningful Association?

My previous post offered a definition of nationalism. I recently stumbled across a great example of nationalist sentiment worthy of consideration. The following clip contains the John McCain concession speech following his loss to Barack Obama in the 2008 Presidential Campaign. The portion relevant here is between 4:00 and 4:10 in the clip below.

McCain, after several moving statements about the historic significance of the Obama presidency, indicated his intention to support the new president as well as his respect for Obama, because “We are fellow Americans, and believe me when I say that no association has ever meant more to me than that.”

This statement was met with fairly vigorous applause. I admire the graciousness and apparent sincerity of the speech. Moreover, I think it demonstrates one of the greatest gifts of modern democratic politics: the routine and peaceful transfer of power.

On the other hand, I am intrigued by the nationalist sentiment evinced in McCain’s statement and the applause it received. McCain has many associations that might be deemed significant. After all, he is someone’s son, husband, father, and friend. McCain identifies as a Christian as well. Yet it is Americaness that is his most important association?

To some scholars of nationalism, sentiments like this come as no surprise. Benedict Anderson believes it no mere coincidence that

The eighteenth century marks not only the dawn of the age of nationalism but the dusk of religious modes of thought. The century of the Enlightenment, of rationalist secularism, brought with it its own modern darkness. With the ebbing of religious belief, the suffering which belief in part composed did not disappear. Disintegration of paradise: nothing makes fatality more arbitrary. Absurdity of salvation: nothing makes continuity more necessary. What then is required was a secular transformation of fatality into continuity, contingency into meaning…few things are better suited to this idea than an idea of nation.

Imagined Communities

We can imagine our nation with a great and glorious past and a “limitless future.” Moreover, “it is the magic of nationalism to turn chance into destiny. With Debray we might say, ‘Yes, it is quite accidental that I am born French; but after all, France is eternal.’”

Anderson is not suggesting a causal relationship between the decline of religiousness in the West and the rise of nationalism as a predominant mode of conceptualizing the individual’s relationship to the world. His point is that “nationalism has to be understood by aligning it, not with self-consciously held political ideologies, but with the large cultural systems that preceded it, out of which—as well as against which—it came into being.”

Essentially, nationalism is a taken-for-granted frame of reference in much of the modern world. This frame is large in scope and makes demands on our loyalty that were once reserved for kinship or religious faith. It is important to remember, however, that nations are “imagined communities.” Or, as Ludwig von Mises put it,

 It is illusory to believe that it is possible to visualize collective wholes. They are never visible; their cognition is always the outcome of the understanding of the meaning which acting men attribute to their acts. We can see a crowd, i.e., a multitude of people. Whether this crowd is a mere gathering or a mass (in the sense in which this term is used in contemporary psychology) or an organized body or any other kind of social entity is a question which can only be answered by understanding the meaning which they themselves attach to their presence. And this meaning is always the meaning of individuals. Not our senses, but understanding, a mental process, makes us recognize social entities.

At bottom, America is a group of persons related to one another by a common set of institutions–some formal, some informal. Institutions are perpetuated to the extent that the norms of conduct which comprise them are internalized by the individuals that make up the community in which they arise. They are important, but they are not sacred. Institutions–even national ones–are valuable only to the extent that they achieve the goals for which they are formed. As countless historical examples attest, we worship our nation at our peril.

A.K.

Advertisements

5 thoughts on “Nation: The Most Meaningful Association?

  1. Not sure McCain was purposefully negating his associations with his family and friends, he is a politician and he’s got to work the crowd. Besides you could argue that the reason he is able to maintain relationships with family and friends is because of this institution. I’d also point out that the same modes of thought and mental processes that influence and are influenced by the collective conscience of the United States and U.S. nationalism are the same modes that drew you to assume that family and friends should be the most significant associations. I do agree with you in your questioning of Americaness and its value only being the extent to which goal are achieved. I think the issue we run into is that our attachment and association with this idea of America, creates an opposition to itself, as the only thing keeping us from experiencing the liberty and justice our four fathers promoted is quite often our ridged beliefs and our ignorance in thinking that America in itself is something separate from the whole system. All of the qualities that America was founded upon, that represent what America stands run natural through everyone and to identify with being American only cuts you off from experiencing America. Therefore a true American would just be his or her self, nothing else at all.

  2. Pingback: Review: Place Matters: Metropolitics for the Twenty-First Century | Economics & Institutions
  3. I’ve been exploring for a bit for any high quality articles or blog posts on this
    sort of space . Exploring in Yahoo I ultimately stumbled upon this web
    site. Reading this info So i am glad to convey that I have a very just right uncanny feeling I discovered exactly
    what I needed. I so much surely will make certain to do not disregard this website and give it a
    look on a constant basis.

    • Thank you for your kinds words. A.K. does a great job with his posts. You could consider following our blog which will send an email every time there is a new post. This may be an easier approach than checking back here and there. We hope to have you keep reading!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s